How are your spelling skills?

Tuesday September 13th 2005, 9:54 am Edit This
Filed under: Humor, Blogs/Blogging, Offbeat

I pride my self on my ability to spell correctly. Often my grammar may be questioned, but seldom my spelling.

When I first saw this, I just couldn’t believe that someone would purposely put something like this together. I’m not sure of the validity of the Cambridge Study, but I am amazed at how easily I could read this.

Gives new meaning to “Hookd on Foniks werkd 4 me!”

Typoglycemia: Don’t skip over this because it looks weird. Believe it or not you can read it.

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid. Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt.

Let me know what you think. Bad spelling accepted.


5 Comments

  1. WOW!

    I stink at spelling (thankfully, there is Spell Chek!).

    Comment by docjim505 — September 13, 2005 @ 12:21 pm | Edit This

  2. Can you read this?

    (hat tip: Echo9er) I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid. Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are,

    Trackback by The Second Opinion — September 13, 2005 @ 12:24 pm | Edit This

  3. Heehee - I ran this one also, after my sister sent it to me (http://barbette.blogspot.com/2005/06/can-you-raed-this.html).

    I’s anziamg how wlel it wrkos !

    Comment by Barb — October 19, 2005 @ 5:11 pm | Edit This

  4. Grammer?? Should be ‘grammar’ but never mind. However, the spelling thing is interesting whether it originaled from Cambridge or not!

    Comment by Annette — November 15, 2005 @ 4:02 am | Edit This

  5. Well, it just goes to show you, it takes many to find a spelling error. Although I did say that my spelling is SELDOM questioned. Annette caught it. Thanks Annette. I made the correction.

    Hooah!!

    Comment by Echo9er — November 15, 2005 @ 10:12 am | Edit This

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 






Copyright © Echo9er, All Rights Reserved
Conestoga Street Wordpress Theme by Theron Parlin